Rode NT1A is a true condenser mic, externally biased, featuring a large 1” capsule with a gold-plated diaphragm. Compared to AKG P220, Rode NT1A is slimmer and lighter, making it more convenient to handle. There are plenty of reviews out there that look at the specs etc. © Musician's HQ 2020 all content used on this site are owned or licensed by for use on this site only, any unauthorized use is prohibited. With the p220 however, you get a couple of extra switches that can be quite handy. We want to interview you. This was particularly true when I tested it out on the podcast, I didn’t like how airy and breathy I sounded at all, and I struggled to fix it using EQ after recording. AKG C214’s equivalent self-noise is actually quite low, only 13 dB-A, which is also certainly sufficient to deliver such a clear high-quality recording, but Rode NT1A is better in this aspect. On top of that, it doesn’t pick up too much background noise. RODE microphones are usually very bright. border-collapse: collapse; While AKG C214 is modeled after the top-class AKG C414 XLII, Rode NT1A is a special release that marks the anniversary of the company. regards, M.T.Pilot March 11, 2009 @07:14pm. Sennheiser MKE 600 vs Rode VideoMic Pro Plus, - Audio Frequency bandwidth 20 to 20000 Hz, - Sensitivity: -31.9dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB, - Maximum SPL: 137dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load). AKG C214 features an integrated suspension that reduces mechanical noise and vibration. AKG P420 vs Rode NT1-A Recomendación por Alfonso el 02/03/2017 6 5130 Urbanboy A.K.A. It just felt a bit clearer, whereas in the final recording from the Rode notes overlapped more and it made the final mix a bit messy. It has a cardioid polar pattern, which means that it captures sounds the best from the front while attenuating … How do the two compare to each other? } Design It is a solid mic that is great for voiceover. I mentioned at the outset of this article, that the reason these microphones are often compared, is due to a similar price point. Similar to the acoustic guitar, on a clean setting the two microphones performed fairly equally. It is off-white and silverish in color. I suppose which could be handy if you live in a noisy neighbourhood. The background noise level on the AKG is quite a bit higher at 16 db(A). It is clean, clear and crisp. In my tests, I tried out the two mics on a variety of sound sources. It is likely in a home studio on a budget you are going to want to use your new microphone for as many different things as possible. table#t17 { I mentioned at the outset of this article, that the reason these microphones are often compared, is due to a similar price point. Your email address will not be published. Both models have a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, which means that they can basically capture similar frequencies. I suggest that you find a store that has both and try them both out and listen to them :) But for the price, I personally don't think you can beat the sE 2200A :). Besides having multiple selectable polar patterns, the audio quality is also enhanced. font-size: 1.0em; Once you hear the breathiness in the recordings it’s hard to un-hear it. The AKG has a flatter frequency response and so may be better if you are a bit more experienced and want to make decisions on the EQ yourself a bit more. Compared to AKG C214, it is certainly slimmer, but also taller and slightly heavier. The way that Rode have tried to tailor this mic to sound great straight out the box is actually the reason some people aren’t massive fans of it. CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS IN THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. link to Can You Use a Single Studio Monitor? table#t17 thead tr th#t17.start { } line-height: 2.0em; is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to (,, or The Rode perhaps slightly justifies it’s higher price tag here as not only do you get a shock mount but you get a nylon pop filter and 6m cable too. Both are praised for the excellent audio reproduction quality, providing a degree of warmth and brightness, as well as delivering very good clarity. padding: 5px; The build quality on the NT1A is nothing short of amazing, and it goes really well with a Scarlett 2i2. So I should probably swiftly move onto that. Check out the similarities and differences between the Rode NT1A vs. AKG C214 in this informative comparison review! It is clear which side is the front with a robust metal grill and logo which look good and overall it looks very stylish. But they are not identical. For example, with the keyboard test I almost couldn’t hear my voice over the sound of the keyboard. The p220 comes in a lovely looking metal carry case which is very light yet feels very sturdy. You could definitely take this case on the road without worrying about the microphone getting damaged. It may pick up things that you don’t want, so be aware of your studio setup. } line-height: 2.0; border-width: 0px; But they are not identical. border-top: medium none; $('.ptp-bullet-item').each(function( index ){ background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%, #8F0000 100%); We want to interview you! You can see some such as the AKG have a fairly flat frequency response, leaving it up to adjust the EQ if required. Inside the microphone itself is a nice matt black and it has a good weight to it, it feels well made when you hold it. Rode NT1A is cylindrical in shape. padding: 4px; However, if you think you don't Rode NT1A is a true condenser mic, externally biased, featuring a large 1" capsule with a gold-plated diaphragm. This will mean you can only listen and... Are you writing an album? The frame is black while the grille is light brown, almost golden. letter-spacing: 0; Musician's HQ also participates in affiliate programs with Plugin Boutique. $('.ptp-price').matchHeight(false); If you are looking for a decent and reliable condenser microphone that does not break the bank, both AKG and Rode would like to offer you their popular condenser models, AKG C214 and Rode NT1A. filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr="#660000", endColorstr="#8F0000",GradientType=0 ); One cool thing about Rode NT1A is that it boasts an extremely ultra-low self-noise level, which is barely 5 dB (A). Some more experienced sound engineers are used to using microphones with a fairly flat frequency response that they can then tweak as required for the particular vocalist or situation. background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%); font-size: 1.0em; Which one should you get? Rode NT1 Shop now at Amazon. The Rode is still excellent though and whilst it is probably bt for vocals it you want to record some guitar too it will do a good job, and it certainly isn’t worth buying a different condenser just for. This is because I’m assuming you are going to be using your large-diaphragm condenser microphone primarily for vocals and in that category, it wins hands down.